🔗 Share this article

Transpired the manager could survive a loss to Grimsby. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, laying waste to the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and appears to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Order: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and energy to join an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, yet finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire him for using excessively that system. Hire the project manager and then bin them for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.